The real annoying thing about Opus 4.6/Codex 5.3 is that it’s impossible to publicly say “Opus 4.5 (and the models that came after it) are an order of magnitude better than coding LLMs released just months before it” without sounding like an AI hype booster clickbaiting, but it’s the counterintuitive truth to my personal frustration. I have been trying to break this damn model by giving it complex tasks that would take me months to do by myself despite my coding pedigree but Opus and Codex keep doing them correctly. On Hacker News I was accused of said clickbaiting when making a similar statement with accusations of “I haven’t had success with Opus 4.5 so you must be lying.” The remedy to this skepticism is to provide more evidence in addition to greater checks and balances, but what can you do if people refuse to believe your evidence?
"itemName": "Aspect_T01_Uncommon_Diamond_Dismantle",
Раскрыты подробности похищения ребенка в Смоленске09:27。关于这个话题，搜狗输入法2026提供了深入分析
20+ curated newsletters。搜狗输入法2026对此有专业解读
你可能错过的好文章具透 Plus：Obsidian 有了命令行界面，Android 17 Beta 真的在「战未来」了。业内人士推荐heLLoword翻译官方下载作为进阶阅读
2024年12月24日 星期二 新京报